Watching a Star Wars pre-quel in a Post-Trump Amerikka.

Rogue One was a call to action. This film makes a reference to  the  military-sanctioned torture seen in Abu Ghraib prison back in ’03( trigger warning: torture) 

In this particular scene, the multi-talented Brit Riz Ahmed160711-news-nightof-hp-lg is hooded and captured, while shouting that he knows of a secret  plans.

There is something to be said about the blind swordsman, other wise known as Zatoichi.

Found in the Mortal Kombat franchise: KENSHI.chibi_kenshi_by_misterwanka-d8sevd3

He cannot see, but ‘The Force is within Him.’ Thus, when he dies, those around him take on this presence.

I won’t go off on a Star Wars fan-rant about the definition of ‘the force,’ however, I will say this: If you have ever felt the force to do something about this disastrous global nonsense that we are in, then Now is the time to do, no longer think. Feel your senses at the heightened level that they are now and now that this will only continue, if shocking details about plans for this land’s future are revealed.

I have had the great opportunity of seeing the sites of various sites of Southern Civil Rights Resistance, i.e. Selma, Alabama; Bomb-ingham Mississippi; insidefeature2STONE MOUNTAIN, Georgia;

Memphis, Tennessee; Harlem and Seneca Village, NYC, to say the least. I have seen this  various pieces of White Supremacy and I have felt the spirits of those that they have destroyed.

Most of us were silenced by the DNC.

The Two-party system is one of this land’s greatest illusions.

Amerikkka may have been claimed by the hooded knights, but now is our time, for reclamation. We must do this through artistic and creative means, in order to make our message clear. We will not not stand for feelings of guilt from the election. We will go forth and stake our claim to the land that has way too much blood on its hands already. Enough is Enough, y’all.

Oh yeah…don’t forget: an overwhelming majority of White Women voted for Trump.

too much tea.gif

Theory Challenge



Amani Jordan

4 April 2016

Theory Challenge

Word Count: 399


Fighting Pigs Within Elsaesser’s ‘Frame’ and Arnheim’s ‘Illusion’


Film must either reflect our reality or create its own. In “Cinema as Window and Frame” film theories are found between two poles: the window and the frame.  The former, utilizes film as a window onto our reality. Here, the  cinematic medium as a realistic art expression. The latter, the frame  privileges a  formalist position: we use cinema in a self-reflexive manner, calling  attention to what one is viewing and experiencing To elaborate: “On the one hand, the window as a medium effaces itself completely and becomes invisible, and on the other, the frame exhibits the medium in its material specificity”(Elsaesser 16). In this week’s film, 10 Nights of Dream (Y. Yamaguchi, 2006), the frame shows itself more than the window.

The pig boxing match scene, is a framed fantasy,  an imagining of Shotaro’s memories. The boxing ring is complete with flashes from unseen photographers. The villainous woman becomes a grotesque hairy, fleshy pig, punishing Shotaro with freeze framed  bloody punches. The pig is created on-screen with spectacular special effects, costuming and makeup. These elements position the viewer(s) within the filmic reality of the male protagonist.

The suspension of disbelief lies within the audience members; there must a willingness to believe that Shotaro is in danger from being hurt by this anthropomorphic animal. The filmic medium does this by acting in this surrealist, fantastical, formalist way. Arnheim in “Film and Reality” elaborates on the concept of film as dream, or ‘illusion.’  He states: “Up to a certain degree, it [film] gives the impression of real life…It is always at one and the same time a flat picture post card and the scene of a living action”(Arnheim 26). Furthermore, this scene constitutes the cinematic art form as one both ‘real life’ and one of imagined fantasy.

Works Cited:

Arnheim, Rudolf.  “Film and Reality.”  1957.

Elsaesser, Thomas. “Cinema as Window and Frame.” 2015.

Yamaguchi, Yudai. 10 Nights of Dream. 2006.




Theory Response Paper EXCERPT

Change Clothes”: Rethinking Kuleshov’s And Astruc’s Male Cinematic Constructor

camera-stylo  looks to the author as genius, a figure that is gifted with knowledge and feels a duty to share it with the rest of the world. Astruc believes that the filmmaker is the new author and  holds power in producing meaning. So, what is the audience’s responsibility? Does an author really express if there is no audience to receive? Although, Astruc believes film has a future in the popular sphere; for him, the technologies of  16mm and TV allow the viewer to explore filmmaking/film viewing in different ways. The filmmaker, for Astruc, is one of modern middle class means: a man that can “possess a projector” does so with a certain level of time and money. The lower-classes of people, the working classes, will they fit into this future of Astruc? Yes, this exclusion is noticeable. Once again, it is pointing to the fact that for early film theorists, the cinematic medium is for the male genius. 

(My excerpt comes from my fourth page, last paragraph)

Here, I  apply Astruc’s ‘classical’ film theory to our cinematic landscape today: a diverse, multi-gendered one. If camera-stylo positions the author with intellectual power, where do folks that don’t go to the cinema regularly(lower socioeconomic classes), fit into this equation? Additionally, Astruc’s exclusive use of male pronouns, positions the filmic philospher as one that is masculine. What about the female audience members as well as film directors/producers/screenwriters?